CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Group (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET) +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT06664931
NCT06664931N/ACompleted

Muscle Energy Versus Mulligan Techniques in Treating Patients With Cervical Spondylosis

Cairo University·interventional·Posted Oct 30, 2024·Updated Jul 16, 2025

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Group (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Group (B) Mulligan Mobilizations Techniques (MMT). for Cervical Spondylosis and 4 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study will be aimed to answer the following questions: Which technique, MET or MMT, is more effective in reducing pain, increasing range of motion (ROM), improving proprioception, and enhancing functional ability in individuals with CS? It will be assumed that: 1. All participants will adhere to study instructions and procedures. 2. All participants will be evaluated under standardized conditions.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesEgypt
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20252026
First PostedOct 30, 2024
Enrollment StartNov 5, 2024
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2025
Study CompletionFeb 1, 2025
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 monthsPosted 1.7 years ago

Interventions

Group (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET)other

MET will be applied to three key muscles commonly associated with neck pain: upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and anterior scalenus.

Group (B) Mulligan Mobilizations Techniques (MMT).other

Participants in Group (B) will receive MMT alongside the traditional treatment. MMT utilizes a specific technique called Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) to improve joint mobilization.