At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Muscle Energy Versus Mulligan Techniques in Treating Patients With Cervical Spondylosis
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Group (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Group (B) Mulligan Mobilizations Techniques (MMT). for Cervical Spondylosis and 4 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study will be aimed to answer the following questions: Which technique, MET or MMT, is more effective in reducing pain, increasing range of motion (ROM), improving proprioception, and enhancing functional ability in individuals with CS? It will be assumed that: 1. All participants will adhere to study instructions and procedures. 2. All participants will be evaluated under standardized conditions.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
MET will be applied to three key muscles commonly associated with neck pain: upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and anterior scalenus.
Participants in Group (B) will receive MMT alongside the traditional treatment. MMT utilizes a specific technique called Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) to improve joint mobilization.