At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 42 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Microscope +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Preliminary Results of Microsurgical Testicular Exploration for Sperm Retrieval in Azoospermic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Operating Microscope vs. Surgical Loupes
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Microscope and Surgical loupes for Azoospermia, Nonobstructive. Completed, enrolled 42 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of the study is to compare surgical outcomes (intra and post-operative complications) and sperm retrieval rates between conventional microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (m-TeSE - Group A) and testicular sperm extraction performed with surgical loupes (l-TeSE - Group B) in adult males with non-obstructive azoospermia.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAzoospermia, Nonobstructive
CountriesItaly
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2023202420252026
Enrollment StartMar 2022
Primary CompletionApr 2024
First PostedNov 2024
TodayJul 2026
First PostedNov 25, 2024
Enrollment StartMar 1, 2022
Primary CompletionApr 30, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.2 yearsPosted 1.6 years ago
Interventions
Microscopedevice
The microscope provides a direct examination of the testicular parenchyma at 20-25x magnification.
Surgical loupesdevice
Surgical loupes offer magnification of 3.5-5x.