At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Two Different Treatment Protocols to Manage Growing Patients With Skeletal Class III and Maxillary Constriction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating RMR with SME and BAIMT with RME for Class III Malocclusion and Maxillary Deficiency. Completed, enrolled 24 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
A clinical examination of each recalled candidate patient will be carried out at Adib Al Lahham Centre at the Ministry of Health Damascus to ensure that he/she meets the inclusion criteria. Following obtaining the full records, including a lateral cephalometric radiograph, additional checking will be made to classify the skeletal relationship (class III relationship) of each possible candidate for this work. This trial compares two groups of patients who suffered from Class III malocclusion associated with maxillary constriction. Experimental Group: Patients in this group will undergo treatment using bone-anchored intermaxillary traction (BAIMT) associated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Control Group: Patients in this group will undergo treatment using a removable mandibular retractor (RMR) associated with slow maxillary expansion (SME).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The RMR will be used in conjunction with slow maxillary expansion
The bone-anchored intermaxillary traction will be used with rapid maxillary expansion