At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating ti mesh and 3d peek mesh for Deficient Alveolar Bone. Completed, enrolled 8 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
In conclusion, the choice between titanium and PEEK meshes should consider patient-specific factors, clinical requirements, and surgeon expertise. The PEEK mesh, with its patient customized design enabled by CAD/CAM technology, offers significant advantages, including greater gained bone volume and reduced operative time. Its tailored fabrication ensures precise adaptation to the patient's anatomy, effectively maintaining the space required for optimal bone formation. The integration of such advanced technologies in regenerative procedures represents a significant step forward in achieving predictable outcomes and enhancing patient care. However, continued innovation and evaluation are crucial to refine these approaches and expand their applicability in oral rehabilitation
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
prebent titamesh on a 3-d virtually augmented model
milled 3d peek mesh