At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Modality Selection: a Lived Experience From Nephrologists. A Nationwide Qualitative Study.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Q methodology for End Stage Renal Disease. Completed, enrolled 25 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
International guidelines for kidney failure emphasize the importance of aligning renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality selection with individuals' preferences through high-quality, structured education. However, observational qualitative studies suggest that pre-dialysis education remains inconsistently delivered, with substantial centre-to-centre variation in the content and organization of Belgian pre-dialysis programs despite a shared healthcare policy. Multiple barriers to home-based therapies have been repeatedly reported at both the unit and patient levels, including nursing shortages, limited availability of trained staff, financial constraints, high rates of unplanned dialysis initiation, distress at treatment start, low health literacy, and an increasingly frail and comorbid patient population. Yet, a minority of dialysis units appear able to mitigate these barriers more effectively than others. This discrepancy raises concern that centre-oriented priorities (unit throughput, cost-effectiveness, technical performance) may still outweigh patient-centred goals (supporting life priorities and meaningful shared decision-making). This study aims to explore nephrologists' beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes regarding shared decision-making in dialysis modality selection and their potential influence on the adoption of alternative RRT modalities beyond in-centre hemodialysis. Q methodology will be used to capture and compare shared viewpoints and patterns of disagreement across participants.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Q- sorting operation is done during a face-to-face meeting of the participant and the interviewer. Participants rank-order a set of statements or opinions into a grid. They rank the importance of statements relative to all others. A specific characteristic of Q Sort is that participants are forced to prioritize amongst statements. During the ranking procedure, they must explain their reasoning process on their positioning of their cards ("thinking-aloud" their reasoning). This audiotaping of the thinking aloud during the actual completion of the Q-Sort allows to not only gain insights in the perceptions of the participants, but also in their underlying reasoning, emotions, and motivation.