CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 50 enrolled
Drug / intervention
nanohybrid composite resinother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT07415317
NCT07415317N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Influence of Composite Placement Techniques on the Clinical Performance of Posterior Restorations in Vital Teeth

Tanta University·interventional·Posted Feb 17, 2026·Updated Feb 17, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating nanohybrid composite resin for Composite Resins and Posterior Teeth. Completed, enrolled 50 participants across 3 sites.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this 12-month randomized clinical investigation was to compare the clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations implanted in vital teeth using various placement techniques.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsComposite Resins, Posterior Teeth
CountriesEgypt
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
202420252026
First PostedFeb 17, 2026
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2024
Primary CompletionJan 6, 2026
Study CompletionJan 17, 2026
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.0 yearsPosted 5 months ago

Interventions

nanohybrid composite resinother

Fifty patients received a total of 200 Class I composite restorations, which were placed using the same nanohybrid composite resin and randomly allocated into four groups (n = 50) according to placement technique: Group I-Stamp technique; Group II-Snowplow technique; Group III-Modified incremental "Pizza" technique; and Group IV-Bulk-fill technique