At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Early Functional Outcomes After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Comparison of the HOOD Technique Versus Standard Anterior Reconstruction
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Prostatectomy with anterior-posterior renconstruciton and Prostatectomy with HOOD techinque for Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma). Completed, enrolled 200 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This prospective, non-randomized cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) between January 2024 and January 2026 following ethics committee approval. Patients with clinically localized prostate cancer eligible for bilateral nerve-sparing surgery were enrolled. Two surgical techniques-anterior-posterior reconstruction (APR) and the HOOD technique-were compared. All procedures were performed by a single high-volume surgeon at a tertiary referral center. The primary endpoint was early urinary continence recovery, assessed at catheter removal and at 3, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, positive surgical margin rates, and early oncological outcomes.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Prostatectomy with anterior-posterior reconstruction involves restoration of both the posterior musculofascial plate and the anterior periurethral support structures during vesicourethral anastomosis, aiming to re-establish normal pelvic anatomy and improve early postoperative urinary continence following radical prostatectomy.
Prostatectomy with the HOOD (Hood technique) is a nerve-sparing approach in which the anterior periprostatic structures, including the detrusor apron and puboprostatic ligaments, are preserved to maintain anterior urethral support and neurovascular integrity, with the aim of improving early urinary continence and functional recovery after radical prostatectomy.