At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Loupes-assisted Versus Conventional Bonding of Brackets in Terms of Discomfort and Bonding Duration in Crowded Dental Arches.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Loupes-based bonding and Traditional bonding for Malocclusion; Displaced Teeth. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study aims to evaluate whether using 3.5x dental magnification loupes improves the speed and patient comfort of the orthodontic bracket placement procedure in patients with crowded dentition, a condition that can make the process more challenging and potentially uncomfortable. We will directly compare the conventional method (unaided vision), which is employed by most orthodontists, with an alternative approach in which the clinician performs bonding while wearing magnification loupes. These loupes provide a clearer and more detailed view of the teeth during the procedure. Both methods will be applied to the same patient using a split-mouth study design. Our primary goal is to determine which method is faster to perform and which one results in less discomfort for the patient during the appointment.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Bonding will be done with improved vision with loupes.
The orthodontist will bond the brackets using the naked-eye method.