At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Academician-Developed Multiple True/False Questions in Anesthesiology Education: A Prospective Cohort Study
In Brief
An observational study for Medical Education and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 26 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and educational value of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated multiple true/false questions compared to those developed by experienced academicians in anesthesiology training. A total of 27 anesthesiology residents will be included in the study. Question sets consisting of 200 multiple true/false items will be created, with half generated by academicians and the other half generated using an artificial intelligence model (ChatGPT-based system). The questions will be based on standardized educational materials from the anesthesiology training curriculum. Participants will complete the test in a single session. Each correct answer will be scored as one point, and total scores will be calculated. In addition to test performance, item difficulty, discrimination indices, and test reliability will be analyzed. Furthermore, participants' perceptions regarding question quality will be evaluated. The study aims to determine whether AI-generated questions can provide a reliable and effective alternative to traditional question development methods in medical education and contribute to more objective and standardized assessment processes.