CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 10 enrolled / 10 target
Drug / intervention
Motor Imagerybehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT07652619
NCT07652619N/ACompletedUpdate Overdue (0.2/mo)Completion was 32mo ago

Motor Imagery Prior to or Alongside Initial Prosthetic Gait Training in Acute Transtibial Amputees: A Feasibility Pilot Study

Ariel University·interventional·Posted Jun 17, 2026·Updated Jun 17, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Motor Imagery for Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 10 participants across 1 site.

Signals

Enrollment appears stalled

Detailed Summary

This study included the development of motor imagery (i.e., the cognitive process of mentally reheasing a motor task) protocol for improving prosthetic gait among acute transtibial amputees. Further, the researchers investigated whether praciticng motor imagery before or alongside initial temporary prosthetic training (aka VESSA) would affect measures of functional status, pain, prosthethis embodiement and motor imagery ability.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesIsrael

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2023202420252026
First PostedJun 17, 2026
Enrollment StartJan 10, 2023
Primary CompletionOct 20, 2023
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 15 days ago

Arms & Interventions

Pre VESSAexperimental

Participants attended the motor imagery training prior to beginning actual temporary prosthetic (VESSA) training

Behavioral: Motor Imagery
With VESSAexperimental

Participants attended the motor imagery training alongside actual temporary prosthetic (VESSA) training

Behavioral: Motor Imagery

Interventions

Motor Imagerybehavioral

The motor imagery intervention aimed to: (1) introduce rationale, mechanisms of action, and advantages of MI; (2) facilitate kinesthetic and functional familiarization with the prosthesis; and (3) enhance prosthetic gait, weight-bearing, balance and turning. The protocol followed MI paradigms and methodologies (e.g., combining visual and kinesthetic modalities), including the PETTLEP model that was previously used in amputees. The MI contents addressed movement range of motion, quality, timing, and lower extremity and whole-body intersegmental coordination with motor tasks serving as outcome measures not being explicitly practiced. The following components were included: 1. Introduction to MI- definition, mechanisms of effect, advantages, modalities, and perspectives. 2. Acquaintance with and embodiment of the stump, MI of the prosthesis and MI of the stump-prosthesis interaction (e.g., contact area, pressure). 3. Weight bearing and shifting during sit-to-stand, standing and gait.